🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the Britain, and it appears it’s time for a reassessment. Over the years, an celebration that was initiated as a festivity and recollection of heritage, traditions and links between Black populations worldwide, has taken on a commercial tone, growing to encompass events where individuals of African heritage are paid to address white audiences about hidden biases and active solidarity. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade sparked an increase in the business of demonstrating racial awareness. But even that moment has passed. The surge has reached its height, producing a diluted aftermath of what increasing understanding is for.

The Origins of Black History Celebration

Initially celebrated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of remembrance and recognition in the February's second week. Black History Month grew out of this movement and was publicly established in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the North America in the second month, but also in October in the United Kingdom, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the Holland.

The month has evolved since those days, focusing less on the accounts of transatlantic enslavement and fights for racial justice, and more on prominent Black figures in government, the arts, and social movements, and extensively acknowledging the contribution Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the method the observance is celebrated is a indication of the current political situation. How it evolves is a instructive case in how appropriation leads to erosion: the restructuring of Black History Month has impeded the objective of it, which is to address structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Jarring Moment

Little demonstrates how critical it is to rethink Black History Month better than the current time in which it occurs this year. In the United Kingdom, a reemerging right-wing in the form of the Reform organization is leading the polls. In the summer we witnessed the largest far-right rally in the history of Britain. Kemi Badenoch, the African descendant in charge of the Tory party, is a staunch adversary of anti-racism activism, and we are in a place where a legislator feels emboldened to say that “not seeing any white faces” in specific city neighborhoods is a reason for concern. At the same time, far-right parties are expanding in the European continent as a complete entity.

In the US, a colossal assault against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been brought, frequently with success, to the supreme judicial bodies of the country. A effort to remove Black history and narrative from the records is in progress. One of the former president's initial presidential directives aimed at the museum of African American legacy, and the renowned cultural organization, claiming they of a coordinated and broad attempt to change the national past” by portraying America “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

In this context, the observance represents how insufficiently it can be influential if it is confined to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or stripped of political content commemorations of former accomplishments, rather than addressing the realities of the current era. It also shows how its short period means that it is disconnected from the more extensive continuous action that is necessary. A university professor, a educator at University of Greenwich, expressed it perfectly when she expressed apprehension about the temporary “tokenism” of the observance. “The issue with taking a tokenistic approach”, she commented, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month evolves into a transient display rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Figuring out how to adapt, revise and extend efforts for equal rights and acknowledgment in such moments of dejection and worry is a treacherous thing. There is a urge to just discontinue things like Black History Month completely, thinking they are simply not fit for purpose, or are relics of an time that has been ineffective.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and legacy of racial movements – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and certainly, even commercial engagements – constitute an framework that a significant effort has been dedicated to. It is there not only to deteriorate as the situation evolves (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month seem? Well, first, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is dispersed across all seasons (as various establishments are already starting to implement), parts of its content (particularly around notable African descendants) included in school curriculums. It would also be a era that does not shy away from political issues, and provides room for individuals, particularly the younger generation, to express their concerns and stories. What value has basic knowledge of the past when it fails to address the present reality of extreme conservative demonstrations in the urban areas? Establishments who observe it should not be pacified with the passive language of “unconscious bias” and awareness of minor insults, but faced with the risks that impact society if opposition to discrimination is not taken seriously. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made contemporary, pressing, and responsive. Maybe an complete renaming is in order – Black History is Now Month.